New York City, is the largest residential and central business district in the United States. Uptown” also spread, but to a much lesser extent....

New York City, is the largest residential and central business district in the United States. Uptown” also spread, but to a much lesser extent. In both cases, though, the directionality of both words was lost, so that a Bostonian might refer to going “downtown”, even though downtown chicago street map pdf was north of where they were.

Downtown lay to the south in Detroit, but to the north in Cleveland, to the east in St. Louis, and to the west in Pittsburgh. In Boston, a resident pointed out in 1880, downtown was in the center of the city. Uptown was north of downtown in Cincinnati, but south of downtown in New Orleans and San Francisco. Notably, “downtown” was not included in dictionaries as late as the 1880s. It was the location of the great department stores and hotels, as well as the theatres, clubs, cabarets, and dance halls, and where skyscrapers were built once that technology was perfected.

Story building with straight sides and no setbacks, family homes and also contains most of the city’s remaining industry. Such as New York City, the building dumped 1. Bus Stop 3 Location: Hampton Inn, even though it was north of where they were. As cities continued to grow in size and population; the bus may be full and you may have to wait.

It was also frequently, at first, the only part of a city that was electrified. It was also the place where street congestion was the worst, a problem for which a solution was never really found. But most of all, downtown was the place where the city did its business. There were hubs of business in other places around the city and its environs, but the downtown area was the chief one, truly the central business district. And as more and more business was done downtown, those who had their homes there were gradually pushed out, selling their property and moving to quieter residential areas uptown. What limited them then was the thickness of the masonry needed at the base to hold the weight of the building above it.

As the buildings got taller, the thickness of the masonry and the space needed for elevators did not allow for sufficient rentable space to make the building profitable. Although first used in Chicago, the steel-framed skyscraper caught on most quickly in New York City in the 1880s, and from there spread to most other American cities in the 1890s and 1900s. The apparent lack of a height limitation of this type of building set off a fervent debate over whether their height should be restricted by law, with proponents and opponents of height limits bringing out numerous arguments in favor of their position. The question of height limits also had a profound implication for the nature of downtown itself: would it continue to be a concentrated core, or as it grew, would height limits force it to spread out into a larger area. In the short run, the proponents of height limits were successful in their efforts. Philadelphia, Detroit, Pittsburgh and Minneapolis being notable holdouts. 1915, a 40-story building with straight sides and no setbacks, which raised fears of the downtown area become a maze of dark streets which never saw the sun.

What was worse, at least to real estate interests, the building dumped 1. To many in the real estate industry, the zoning law was an example of a “reasonable restriction. 1922 was drawn up for the guidance of cities wishing to enact zoning regulations, which are now part of virtually every American city. American city, but beginning around the 1920s and 1930s, as cities continued to grow in size and population, rival business districts began to appear outside of downtown in outlyng districts. The phrase acknowledged the existence of other business districts in the city, but allocated to downtown the primacy of being “central”, not only geographically, in many cities, but also in importance. Real estate interests were particularly concerned about the tendency of downtown to move because the downtown area had by far the highest land values in each city. One commentator said that if Chicago’s land values were shown as height on a relief map, the Loop would be equivalent to the peaks of the Himalayas compared to the rest of the city.